The changing economic and social context in Britain seemed to  require 
a closer integration of education, training, and  employment;  at  the  same 
time, a sharper focus on personal development; greater concentration of  the 
partnership to include employers and parents; and a dominant position  given 
to central government in stipulating outcomes were  all  factors  which  led 
the framework of the system is adapting to the new contexts. 
a)The public system of education might be illustrated as follows: 
|Age                  |Type of school       |National exams and   | 
|                     |                     |assessments          | 
|4                    |Nursery school       |                     | 
|                     |(optional and where  |                     | 
|                     |available)           |                     | 
|Beginning of         |                     |                     | 
|compulsory education |                     |                     | 
|5                    |Primary school       |Baseline assessment  | 
|6                    |Primary school       |                     | 
|7                    |Primary school       |Assessment Key Stage | 
|                     |                     |1                    | 
|8                    |Primary school of    |                     | 
|                     |Middle school        |                     | 
|9                    |Primary school of    |                     | 
|                     |Middle school        |                     | 
|10                   |Primary school of    |                     | 
|                     |Middle school        |                     | 
|11                   |Secondary school of  |Assessment Key Stage | 
|                     |Middle school        |2                    | 
|12                   |Secondary school of  |                     | 
|                     |Middle school        |                     | 
|13                   |Secondary school of  |                     | 
|                     |Middle school        |                     | 
|14                   |Secondary School     |Assessment Key Stage | 
|                     |                     |3                    | 
|15                   |Secondary School     |Start of GCSE course | 
|16                   |Secondary School     |GCSE exams           | 
|End of compulsory    |                     |                     | 
|education            |                     |                     | 
|17                   |Secondary School     |Start of A-level     | 
|                     |Sixth Form           |course               | 
|                     |College of Further   |                     | 
|                     |Education            |GNVQ                 | 
|                     |Work Training Scheme |                     | 
|                     |                     |NVQ                  | 
|18                   |Secondary School     |A-level exams        | 
|                     |Sixth Form           |GNVQ                 | 
|                     |College of Further   |NVQ                  | 
|                     |Education            |                     | 
|                     |Work Training Scheme |                     | 
b) Schools and the post-16 curriculum 
      The maintenance of such a curriculum has been a major function of the 
examination system at 16, which was originally designed as a preparation 
for the post-16 courses leading to A-level. It is taken in single subjects, 
usually not more than three. These three subjects, studied in depth, in 
turn constituted a preparation for the single or double subject honors 
degrees at university. In this way the shape of the curriculum for the 
majority has been determined by the needs of the minority aspiring to a 
university place. Alongside «A» Levels, there have been, more recently, 
«AS» (Advanced Supplementary) Level examinations. These are worth half an 
«A» Level and they enable very bright students to broaden their educational 
experience with a «contrasting» subject (for example, the science 
specialist might study a foreign language). 
      The present «A» and «AS» Level system, however, is thought to be in 
need of reform. First, it limits choice of subjects at 16 and 17 years, a 
time, when a more general education should be encouraged. Second, 
approximately 30% of students either drop out or fail - a mass failure rate 
amongst a group of young people from the top 30% of academic achievement 
who find that after two years they have no qualification. Third, the 
concentration on academic success thus conceived has little room for the 
vocationally relevant skills and personal qualities stressed by those 
employers who are critics of the education system. Fourth, there are over 
600 «A» Level syllabuses from eight independent examination boards often 
with overlapping titles and content, making comparability of standards 
between Boards difficult. 
                             The private sector 
      B 
y 1997 8 per cent of the school population attended  independent  fee-paying 
schools, compared with under 6 per cent in 1979, and  only  5  per  cent  in 
1976. By the year 2000 the proportion may rise to almost 9 per cent,  nearly 
back to the level in 1947 of 10 per cent. The recovery of private  education 
in Britain is partly due  to  middle-class  fears  concerning  comprehensive 
schools, but also to the mediocre  quality  possible  in  the  state  sector 
after decades of inadequate funding. 
      Although the percentage of those privately educated  may  be  a  small 
fraction of the total, its importance is disproportionate to its  size,  for 
this 8 per cent accounts for 23 per cent of all those passing A levels,  and 
over 25 per cent of those gaining entry to university. Nearly  65  per  cent 
of pupils leave fee-paying schools with one or more A levels, compared  with 
only 14 per cent from  comprehensives.  Tellingly,  this  8  per  cent  also 
accounts for 68 per  cent  of  those  gaining  the  highest  grade  in  GCSE 
Physics. During the 1980s  pupils  at  independent  schools  showed  greater 
improvement in their examination results than those  at  state  schools.  In 
later life, those educated at fee-paying schools  dominate  the  sources  of 
state power and authority in government, law, the armed forces and finance. 
      The 'public' (in fact private, fee-paying) schools form  the  backbone 
of the independent sector. Of the several hundred public schools,  the  most 
famous are the 'Clarendon Nine', so named  after  a  commission  of  inquiry 
into  education  in  1861.  Their  status  lies  in  a  fatally   attractive 
combination of social superiority and  antiquity,  as  the  dates  of  their 
foundation indicate: Winchester  (1382),  Eton  (1440),  St  Paul's  (1509), 
Shrewsbury (1552), Westminster (1560), The Merchant Taylors'  (1561),  Rugby 
(1567), Harrow (1571) and Charterhouse (1611). 
      The golden age of the public schools, however, was the late nineteenth 
century, when most were founded. They were vital to the establishment  of  a 
particular set of values in the dominant professional middle classes.  These 
values were reflected in the novel Tom Brown's Schooldays by Thomas  Hughes, 
written in tribute to his own happy time at Rugby School.  Its  emphasis  is 
on the making of gentlemen to enter one of the professions:  law,  medicine, 
the Church, the Civil Service  or  the  colonial  service.  The  concept  of 
'service', even if it only involved entering a  profitable  profession,  was 
central to the public school ethos. A career in  commerce,  or  'mere  money 
making' as it is referred to in  Tom  Brown's  Schooldays,  was  not  to  be 
considered. As a result  of  such  values,  the  public  school  system  was 
traditional in its view of learning and  deeply  resistant  to  science  and 
technology. Most public schools were located in the 'timeless'  countryside, 
away from the vulgarity of industrial cities. 
      After 1945, when state-funded grammar schools were demonstrating equal 
or greater academic  excellence,  the  public  schools  began  to  modernise 
themselves. During the 1970s most of them abolished beating  and  'fagging', 
the system whereby new boys carried out menial tasks for  senior  boys,  and 
many introduced girls into the sixth form, as a civilising  influence.  They 
made particular efforts to improve their academic  and  scientific  quality. 
Traditionally boarding public schools  were  more  popular,  but  since  the 
1970s there has been a  progressive  shift  of  balance  in  favour  of  day 
schools. Today only 16 per  cent  of  pupils  in  private  education  attend 
boarding schools, and the number of boarders declines on average  by  3  per 
cent each year. 
      Demand for public school education is now so great that  many  schools 
register pupils' names at birth. Eton  maintains  two  lists,  one  for  the 
children of 'old  boys'  and  the  other  for  outsiders.  There  are  three 
applicants for every vacancy. Several other schools have two applicants  for 
each vacancy, but they are careful not to expand  to  meet  demand.  In  the 
words of one academic, 'Schools at the top  of  the  system  have  a  vested 
interest in being elitist. They  would  lose  that  characteristic  if  they 
expanded. To some extent they  pride  themselves  on  the  length  of  their 
waiting lists.' This rush to private education is despite the steep rise  in 
fees, 31 per cent between 1985 and 1988, and over 50 per cent  between  1990 
and 1997 when the average annual day fees  were  Ј5,700  and  boarding  fees 
double that figure. Sixty per cent of  parents  would  probably  send  their 
children to fee-paying schools if they could afford to. 
      In order to obtain a place at a public school, children  must  take  a 
competitive examination, called 'Common Entrance'.  In  order  to  pass  it, 
most children destined for a public school education  attend  a  preparatory 
(or 'prep') school until the age of 13. 
      Independent schools remain politically controversial. The Conservative 
Party believes in the fundamental freedom of  parents  to  choose  the  best 
education for their children. The Labour Party disagrees,  arguing  that  in 
reality only the wealthier citizens have this  freedom  of  choice.  In  the 
words of Hugh Gaitskell, the Labour leader in 1953, 'We really cannot go  on 
with a system in which wealthy parents are able to buy what  they  and  most 
people believe to be a better education for their children.  The  system  is 
wrong and must be changed.' But since then no Labour  government  has  dared 
to abolish them. 
      There can be no doubt that a better academic education can be obtained 
in some of the public schools. In 1993 92 of the 100 schools with  the  best 
A-level results were fee-paying. But the  argument  that  parents  will  not 
wish to pay once state schools offer equally good education  is  misleading, 
because  independent  schools  offer  social  status   also.   Unfortunately 
education depends  not  only  on  quality  schools  but  also  on  the  home 
environment. The background from  which  pupils  come  greatly  affects  the 
encouragement they receive to study. Middle-class parents are likely  to  be 
better able, and more concerned, to support their children's study than low- 
income parents who themselves feel they failed at  school.  State-maintained 
schools  must  operate  with  fewer  resources,  and   in   more   difficult 
circumstances, particularly in low-income areas.  In  addition,  the  public 
school system creams off many of the ablest teachers from the state sector. 
      The public school system is socially divisive, breeding an  atmosphere 
of  elitism  and  leaving  some  outside  the  system  feeling  socially  or 
intellectually inferior, and in  some  cases  intimidated  by  the  prestige 
attached to public schools. The  system  fosters  a  distinct  culture,  one 
based not only upon social superiority  but  also  upon  deference.  As  one 
leading journalist, Jeremy Paxman, himself an ex-public schoolboy  remarked, 
The purpose of a public school education is to teach you to  respect  people 
you don't respect.' In the words of Anthony Sampson, himself an ex-pupil  of 
Westminster, the public school elite 'reinforces  and  perpetuates  a  class 
system whose divisions run  through  all  British  institutions,  separating 
language, attitudes and motivations'. 
      Those who attend these schools continue to dominate  the  institutions 
at the heart of the British state, and seem likely to do so  for  some  time 
to come. At the beginning of the 1990s public schools accounted for  22  out 
of 24 of the army's top  generals,  two-thirds  of  the  Bank  of  England's 
external directors, 33 out of 39 top English judges, and ambassadors in  the 
15 most important diplomatic missions abroad. Of the 200 richest  people  in 
Britain no fewer than 35 had attended Eton. Eton and Winchester continue  to 
dominate the public school scene, and the wider  world  beyond.  As  Sampson 
asks, 'Can the products of two schools (Winchester and Eton),  it  might  be 
asked, really effectively represent the other 99.5 per cent  of  the  people 
in this diverse country who  went  to  neither  mediaeval  foundation?'  The 
concept of service was once at the heart of the public school ethos, but  it 
is questionable whether it still is.  A  senior  Anglican  bishop  noted  in 
1997, 'A headmaster told me recently that the whole concept of  service  had 
gone. Now they all want to become merchant bankers and lawyers.' 
      There are two arguments that qualify the merit of the public  schools, 
apart  from  the  criticism  that  they  are  socially   divisive.   It   is 
inconceivable that the  very  best  intellectual  material  of  the  country 
resides solely among those able to attend such schools. If one accepts  that 
the brightest  and  best  pupils  are  in  fact  spread  across  the  social 
spectrum, one must conclude  that  an  elitist  system  of  education  based 
primarily upon wealth rather than ability  must  involve  enormous  wastage. 
The other serious qualification regards the public school ethos which is  so 
rooted  in  tradition,  authority  and  a  narrow  idea   of   'gentlemanly' 
professions. Even  a  century  after  it  tried  to  turn  its  pupils  into 
gentlemen,  the  public   school   culture   still   discourages,   possibly 
unconsciously, its pupils from  entering  industry.  'It  is  no  accident,' 
Sampson comments, 'that most formidable industrialists in Britain come  from 
right outside  the  public  school  system,  and  many  from  right  outside 
Britain.' 
      Britain will be unable to  harness  its  real  intellectual  potential 
until it can break loose from a divisive culture that should belong  in  the 
past, and can create its future elite from the nation's schoolchildren as  a 
whole. In 1996 a radical Conservative politician argued for  turning  public 
schools into centres of excellence which  would  admit  children  solely  on 
ability, regardless of  wealth  or  social  background,  with  the  help  of 
government funding. It would be a way of  using  the  best  of  the  private 
sector for the nation as a whole. It is just such an idea that Labour  might 
find  attractive,  if  it  is  able  to  tackle  the  more  widespread   and 
Страницы: 1, 2, 3, 4 
   
 |