acquainted with famous artists: Picasso, Matisse. New tendencies in

painting (cubism, abstractionism) impressed her very much.

Abstraction tendencies dominated in her artistic works. She claimed that

only Spanish & American writers were able to realize abstract notions in

literature. This abstraction must be expressed by the deformity of the

form. She was the only representative of literary abstractionism. Her

desire was to get rid of the content of words (of the meaning) so that she

could be able to concentrate on the plastic properties of the language &

its syntax. She was going to capture inner & outer reality in the most

precise & objective form.

Literature must not awake any associations: associative emotions are

invalid. Everything that is the result of emotions cannot be the gist of

literary work, cannot be material for prose & poetry. They must consist in

the precise rendering of internal & external reality. The words must

express the reality directly, she tried to devoid them of any meaning. But

she forgot that the painter & the writer use different media for their

arts. But if colours have no meaning the words obviously possess it. She

wanted to create pure literature by using pure words, no one else tried to

do that before. She emptied the words of the thought & created almost her

private language & that was the extreme. It showed how far one could go in

violating the language.

Another novelty – the new concept of time. She tried a new method of

narration – “continuous present”. Instead of the narration she creates a

composition where a story is presented as if happening at the present

moment, not as a consequent unfolding of the theme as we perceive reading.

She did acknowledge that such a category as time in literature would

transform into continuous perception of the present moment. So she tried to

put this theory into practice in her book “The Making of Americans”.

In “The Making of America” describing the history of the Gestland family

she tries at the same time to give a picture of American history. She tried

to describe individual & general simultaneously. And that resulted in the

style, which was very awkward. She also tried to use the technique that she

borrowed from cinematography, like in a film each next shot presents a

slight variation from the previous one. Each next sentence differed from

the previous one only insignificantly (regularly-repeated phrases, key

words). It may look ridiculous, stupid, but many modern writers took this

repetition from her.

Another side the so-called portraits in literature were created on the

basis of rhythmic principle. Every person has his own rhythm & in

portraying a person’s life she tried to combine & match these rhythms –

literary expressionism. The result of this was simplification of syntax,

foregrounding of the verbs, minimal punctuation & omission of nouns &

adjectives. “Tender Buttons” is a collection of poems, examples of this

technique. The reaction was not unanimous. They accused the style for

deintellectualization. For example, Malcolm Kowly said that “reading her

style annoys us…”. Stein’s experiments are not so important by itself

because they warned other artists against taking the same route. Her works

are fruitless & senseless – they distract the communication. But her

experiments are noticeable in Hemingway’s syntax, Faulkner’s “continuous

present” (=past does exist in the present), Sherwood Anderson’s principles

of cinematography. Her significance – she was the first English writer who

expressed those tendencies which were the distinctive features of the avant-

garde movement.

John Doss Passos (1896-1970)

He was born in Chicago. He lived a long life but his most productive

period was in the 20-30’s of the XXth century. He reflected the progressive

ideas of the time, produced the epic of American life within the framework

of a literary experiments. He graduated from Harvard. In 1916-17 studied

architecture in Spain & this background can be felt in his works in their

architecture. Participated in the war & after that he began to write. His

first book – “One Man’s Initiation”(1920). It was the first book in

American literature, which treats the war topic. It is a lost generation

book because it was motivated by post-was disillusionment that young people

experienced. The pathos is clearly antiwar. It is autobiographical. The

pacifist motives are very strong here. The style doesn’t differ much from

that of his mature works. Dos Passos chose the fragmentary way of

organization of material, which is to his mind, more expressive. The book

is in the form of interior monologue – to express more precisely the crash

of a young American world in the war.

He continued the same technique in “Three Soldiers”. He attacks the

corruption of the world, socialist motives become more explicit in his

work. Here he experiments with writing technique – plot. The lives of three

young people – Americans – are in the focus of his attention. At first

their lives are connected, they met each other on the same boat but this is

the only point where their fates are close. As they arrive in Europe their

ways diverge. Each one follows his own path. The plot decenters, follows

the life of each of three heroes. All of them are ruined at the war, feel

lost, disillusioned. It is a typical lost generation novel written in the

modernist technique. John Andrews is a painter, he dreams to express his

protest against the war by artistic means. Both J. Andrews in the book & J.

D. Passos fear capitalist tyranny & revolutionary enthusiasm. Antibourgeois

pathos is rather strong.

These tendencies increase in his next works. “Manhattan Transfer”

(novel) is a kaleidoscope of numerous episodes, names, dates where the

reader can hardly find the characters. It consists of independent stories,

which are all mixed. The only similar feature is the place & the time. Dos

Passos considered that such composition will enable him to show the reality

objectively, a stream of New York life. Characters represent different

social layers. The author introduces clips from newspapers, some glimpses

of literature, which are not connected with the novel. It produces

disorder. But it was his intention – city is a chaos; life is a chaos.

Reaction to the novel was contradictory. Some thought that it was a

collectivist novel. Dos Passos was not in the individual lives, troubles or

joys. A collectivist writer was interested in social relations but the

paradox was that social relations were abstract from his work. He didn’t

dispose social. His attitude to the events is not clear. The lack of

objective conclusions was intentional but the writer can’t do that. He

tried to produce such works where the generalization should be.

He was popular in 20-30’s in Soviet Union, unfortunately his popularity

was short-lived for political reasons. As soon as he began to criticize &

warn against totalitarianism he fell out of grace. He lived through the

economic crises of 1929 & this found its expression in the novel “USA”.

Dos Passos wrote “USA” – a big epic where he paid more attention to

generalization. He wrote it for 20 years. It consists of 3 novels: “The 42

Parallel”, “1919”, “The Big Money”. Dos Passos tried to be more precise

with the composition, developed a scheme of it. It is a big panoramic work.

The real hero is American society, the country. It is shown against the

social background of the nation. It is an epic of American life. The

structure is very logical & coherent. Each chapter falls into several

parts, which are made up of for components & the combination of these

components is very different. These four components are:

V novel - the portraits of literary characters

V biographies of historical personalities

V news-reel, i.e. news of the day

V camera obscure (eye) – inner monologue of the author

Each piece has a title & a number. The biographies of historical

personality were intended to create the historical background, dedicated to

famous people of political, social, scientific, artistic activities. It

included the stories about the outstanding people.

News of the day was to documentarize the specific moments in the USA

history to create the historical colouring & objective picture of that

epoch. It included popular songs, headlines from papers. Here they try to

follow the stream of consciousness of the newspaper reader.

Camera obscure were to show the author’s attitude to life, to bring an

individual lyrical touch to the story, personal meditations upon certain

subjects, reminiscences of the things passed, expression of author’s ideas

upon various aspects of life. It gave a picture of the author’s evaluation

for 30 years.

Novels are fictions. The portraits of literary characters were imaginary

literary heroes. There were 11 of them – typical representatives of all the

layers of the American society. The central characters John Wool McHouse.

The author tries to trace his relations with other characters but it

doesn’t mean that he knows all of them.

From the unique combination of these elements the unique picture of

American life springs up. The general mood is that of confusion, tension,

tumult, frustration of hopes, feeling that the present is ugly &

intolerable. People are too fussy about their daily routine. In this work

he showed how life was lived on the national scale.

Dos Passos was concerned with the history of the country primarily. The

writer must be an architect of history. His work was a literary conclusion

– different elements were assembled. The work is considered to be an

achievement in the American literature. The author tried to use

cinematographic principles in writing: close up, precision in details, the

art of assembly. He also used the technique of montage or juxtaposition. In

his later works he perfected this technique & achieved quite a success in

it. Later he became a radical writer. He was a passionate individualist &

individual freedom was most important to him.

Francis Scott Fitzgerald (1896-1940)

He belongs to the lost generation but he gave his own name to it – “jazz

age”. Jazz was representative of the general atmosphere of the years – the

feeling of instability in life. Age of transition of social values. To his

mind jazz beat ideally expressed that feeling of hopeless despair with

which his young men & women tried to experience the every passing moment of

their lives, their age. There is a recurrent “capre diem”(лови момент)

theme in his novels. His heroes indulge & overindulge. Jazz age expresses

instability & changebility of life present in mind of many people who tried

to flee from the feeling of being lost, for they no longer believed in

life, so they tried to live it to their full. Fitzgerald was not very rich

but was educated in Princeton. He dropped out of it because of poor health

& poor performance, he didn’t get to front though he enlisted. He was

painfully aware of the difference between himself & rich students. He had

hatred for the rich. The main topic of his work – money & its corruptive

influence. For him money & wealth were social categories. He regarded the

rich to be another race, whose habits & moral principles differ very much.

He looked into the phenomenon of being rich. For him a rich person is one

for whom everything is permitted & they lack human qualities, he tried to

penetrate to the very heart of the matter. So, money & wealth for him were

not economic categories but social phenomena. He regarded rich as another

race, alien kind of people whose habits, moral principles, views were not

as the habits of the ordinary people. They are the people to whom

everything is permitted & consequently they lack certain human qualities

that of pity, compassion, and sympathy. In his works Fitzgerald striped

this world of this mysterious veil. He tried to penetrate to the very

depths exploring the ethics of the rich world. Wealth has dehumanizing

impact on human personality. He had a feeling that something awful is

coming. “All the stories that come to my head have touch of disaster”. He

produced the collection of short stories “All the Sad Young Men”, “Tales of

the Jazz Age”. They are permeated with appocaliptical feeling of tragedy

of American life. Fitzgerald was not the only one who treated this topic –

Theodore Dreiser in “American Tragedy” did the same.

His finest achievement is the novel “The Great Gatsby” which showed the

contrast between material wealth & the spiritual poverty of the heroes.

Concerning this work in Soviet criticism the term “поэзия отрицательных

величин” was used. It means that he tried to show people who were real

characters, strong individuals, but this all is directed not to a right

channel – to make one’s life to the top, to get something from life, strive

for the world success. For Gatsby wealth is not the purpose but means to

have everything that money can give, a key to personal happiness =

relations between Jay Gatsby & Daisy whom he loves. In youth he suffered

feeling of inferiority, for she was the daughter of rich parents & he was a

poor soldier. He seeks to get money by bootlegging but it turned out that

happiness could not be achieved even with money because Daisy had changed,

she is very deaf & blind spiritually, feeling of all-permissiveness

increased in her. She doesn’t stop short in the fraud (car accident).

Gatsby was killed, Daisy departed, fled with her husband without any

remorse. Gatsby’s tragedy lies in the fact that he hoped to find happiness,

sympathy, love in the world where these feelings don’t exist. The tragedy

is that money changes people & money changed him & Daisy & he didn’t

understand this tragedy couldn’t foresee it.

Was he a positive or a negative character for the author? He possesses

good moral qualities but he is not the paragon of moral beauty, he obtained

his wealth by not clear ways. It’s clear that he is a tragic person. He

wastes his talent for money. Very often he is compared to Clyde Griffite

(Dreiser’s). But Gatsby is a personality.

Fitzgerald’s own story in a way repeats Gatsby’s story: he lived

bohemian life, gradually writing became an obligation. He appeared to be a

hostage of his own success. He also had drinking problems, & his wife whom

he loved very deeply had some mental problems.

The other works are “This Side of Paradise”, “Tender is the Night”, “The

Last Typcoon”, “The Beautiful & the Damned” where he developed the same

topic. Fitzgerald also had a dilemma & he had to choose to write for money

Страницы: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5